• Courses
      • Global Series of National Privacy Laws
      • Netherlands Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
      • Caribbean Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
    • Resources
    • Join GADPPRO ACADEMY
      • Join GADPPRO Academy as an Official Partner
      • Become an Official GADPPRO Training Entity
      • Join the GADPPRO Business Academy
      • Secretariat & International Training Centre
      • Contact Us
    •  
      • RegisterLog in
    Privacad GADPPRO Academy
      • Courses
        • Global Series of National Privacy Laws
        • Netherlands Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
        • Caribbean Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
      • Resources
      • Join GADPPRO ACADEMY
        • Join GADPPRO Academy as an Official Partner
        • Become an Official GADPPRO Training Entity
        • Join the GADPPRO Business Academy
        • Secretariat & International Training Centre
        • Contact Us
      •  
        • RegisterLog in

      Blog

      GDPR Dispute resolution by the Board

      • Categories Blog, Free Data Protection Resources
      • Date August 29, 2020

      Article 65 GDPR

      Dispute resolution by the Board

      1. In order to ensure the correct and consistent application of this Regulation in individual cases, the Board shall adopt a binding decision in the following cases:

      (a) where, in a case referred to in Article 60(4), a supervisory authority concerned has raised a relevant and reasoned objection to a draft decision of the lead supervisory authority and the lead super­visory authority has not followed the objection or has rejected such

      an objection as being not relevant or reasoned. ◄ The binding decision shall concern all the matters which are the subject of the relevant and reasoned objection, in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation;

      (b) where there are conflicting views on which of the supervisory auth­orities concerned is competent for the main establishment;

      (c) where a competent supervisory authority does not request the opinion of the Board in the cases referred to in Article 64(1), or does not follow the opinion of the Board issued under Article 64. In that case, any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission may communicate the matter to the Board.

      2. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted within one month from the referral of the subject-matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further month on account of the complexity of the subject-matter. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to the lead supervisory authority and all the supervisory authorities concerned and binding on them.

      3. Where the Board has been unable to adopt a decision within the periods referred to in paragraph 2, it shall adopt its decision within two weeks following the expiration of the second month referred to in paragraph 2 by a simple majority of the members of the Board. Where the members of the Board are split, the decision shall by adopted by the vote of its Chair.

      4. The supervisory authorities concerned shall not adopt adecision on the subject matter submitted to the Board under paragraph 1 during the periods referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.

      5. The Chair of the Board shall notify, without undue delay, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 to the supervisory authorities concerned. It shall inform the Commission thereof. The decision shall be published on the website of the Board without delay after the super­visory authority has notified the final decision referred to in paragraph 6.

      6. The lead supervisory authority or, as the case maybe, the super­visory authority with which the complaint has been lodged shall adopt its final decision on the basis of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, without undue delay and at the latest by one month after the Board has notified its decision. The lead supervisory authority or, as the case may be, the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged, shall inform the Board of the date when its final decision is notified respectively to the controller or the processor and to the data subject. The final decision of the supervisory authorities concerned shall be adopted under the terms of Article 60(7), (8) and (9). The final decision shall refer to the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall specify that the decision referred to in that paragraph will be published on the website of the Board in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article. The final decision shall attach the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.

      • Share:
      author avatar
      Privacy Professor

      Professor mr drs Romeo F. Kadir MA MSc LLM LLM (Adv) EMBA EMoC

      At present Romeo Kadir serves as the President of the Global Association of Data Protection Professionals Europe (GADPPRO). GADPPRO is a thought leader self-regulatory association of data protection professionals based in the European Union, active around the globe and the first European Association of data protection professionals open for members outside the EU. Please visit www.gadppro.org for more information.

      First appointed Data Protection Officer (DPO) ever in the Netherlands (European Union) at a semi-public entity. Seasoned European Privacy and Data Protection Expert (22+ years of practical experience in EU Privacy and Data Protection Law, Business Management, Compliance and Ethics).

      Studied European and International Law, Political Sciences and Business Administration. Romeo Kadir is EIPACC EADPP Professor European Privacy & Data Protection Law at Universitas Padjadjaran UNpad (Indonesia) and Honorary Visiting Research Fellow with O.P. Jindal Global University (New Delhi), Senior Associate Fellow with Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy (New Delhi), Lecturer Science Honours Academy and Lecturer at the International Molengraaff Institute, Utrecht University (UU, Netherlands). In 2010 he was founder of the first European Data Protection Academy focusing on privacy-only executive education.

      Present Occupations in European Data Protection Law

      Member of the International Bar Association (IBA)
      Member of the International Board of Experts with EuroPrivacy Certification Scheme (Geneva and Luxembourg)
      Member of the International Strategic Board with EuroPrivacy Certification Scheme (Geneva and Luxembourg)
      Member of the Swiss-Chinese Law Association (SCLA)

      Former Occupations in European Data Protection Law

      President European Institute for Privacy, Audit, Compliance & Certification (EIPACC)
      Co-Founder/Vice-President European Association for Data Protection Professionals (EADPP)
      Chair EADPP Certification Committee Data Protection Professionals,
      Chair EADPP Academic Board
      Chair EADPP Expert Committee on Cybersecurity
      Chair EADPP Expert Committee on Artificial Intelligence (AI)
      President Supervisory Board of the Dutch Privacy Complaints Office (NPKI)
      Rapporteur to UN Monitoring Commission Human Rights on behalf of the Dutch Privacy Foundation (SPN)

      Publications

      'Handbook DPO - A Practical Guide', Privacy Publishing Group (2017)
      Editor-in-Chief of ‘Data Protection Dictionary’, authored, edited and coordinated ‘Handbook for the Data Protection Officer – A practical Guide’, ‘The Ultimate GDPR Business Guide – Six Volumes’ and other relevant books in the field of privacy and data protection (www.dataprotectionbooks.com)

      www.romeokadir.eu

      Previous post

      GDPR Opinion of the Board
      August 29, 2020

      Next post

      GDPR Urgency procedure
      August 29, 2020

      You may also like

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679
      29 November, 2020

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679 Paragraph 3.2.3  Risks to free flow of personal data within the Union 44. Where the objection will refer to this particular risk, the CSA will need to clarify why it …

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679
      29 November, 2020

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679 Paragraph 3.2.2  Risks to fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects 39. The issue at stake concerns the impact the draft decision as a whole would have on the data …

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679
      29 November, 2020

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679 Paragraph 3.2.1  Meaning of “significance of the risks” 35. It is important to bear in mind that the goal of the work carried out by SAs is that of protecting …

      Search

      Categories

      • Blog
      • Business
      • Design / Branding
      • Free Data Protection Resources
      • Nederlandse Privacy Academie
      • Uncategorized
      Facebook-f Linkedin-in

      © Privacad 2020

      For all your questions about courses

      students@privacad.com

      For all your questions about Privacad for business

      info@privacad.com

      Links

      • Courses
      • Become a GADPPRO Academy Official Training Entity
      • Resources
      • Free Data Protection Resources
      • Blog
      • Profile
      • Students Stewards Network (SSN)

      Support

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
      • FAQs
      • Contact

      © GADPPRO Academy | Privacad 2022

      GADPPRO Academy 2022

      Login with your site account

      Lost your password?

      Not a member yet? Register now

      Register a new account

      Are you a member? Login now